Estás cordialmente invitado a unirte a mi y a otros amigos en GNUsocial, creemos juntos una red social mejor.

Para aceptar la invitación visita y regístrate en https://gnusocial.nsupdate.info/ o en cualquier otro servidor público de GNUsocial.

Los servidores de GNUsocial están interconectados para crear una enorme red social centrada en la privacidad y controlada por sus miembros. También se puede conectar con muchas redes sociales tradicionales. Mira en https://the-federation.info/platform/20 para poder ver un listado de servidores alternativos de GNUsocial donde puedes darte de alta.

Una vez registrado, por favor contacta conmigo a través de mi página de perfil en:

https://gnusocial.nsupdate.info/lu4ehf

Para más información sobre el proyecto GNUsocial y por qué sentimos que es importante, visite https://gnusocial.network/ , por favor

#mastodon #diaspora #twitter #social #facebook #friendica #spanish #es #español #fediverso #fediverse #hola #nuevo #hi #new #presentación #gnusocial

Estás cordialmente invitado a unirte a mi y a otros amigos en GNUsocial, creemos juntos una red social mejor.

Para aceptar la invitación visita y regístrate en https://gnusocial.nsupdate.info/  o en cualquier otro servidor público de GNUsocial.

Los servidores de GNUsocial están interconectados para crear una enorme red social centrada en la privacidad y controlada por sus miembros. También se puede conectar con muchas redes sociales tradicionales. Mira en https://the-federation.info/platform/20 para poder ver un listado de servidores alternativos de GNUsocial donde puedes darte de alta.

Una vez registrado, por favor contacta conmigo a través de mi página de perfil en:

https://gnusocial.nsupdate.info/lu4ehf

Para más información sobre el proyecto GNUsocial y por qué sentimos que es importante, visite https://gnusocial.network/ , por favor

#mastodon #diaspora #twitter #social #facebook #friendica #spanish #es #español #fediverso #fediverse #hola #nuevo #hi #new #presentación #gnusocial

Estás cordialmente invitado a unirte a mi y a otros amigos en GNUsocial, creemos juntos una red social mejor.

Para aceptar la invitación visita y regístrate en https://gnusocial.nsupdate.info/ o en cualquier otro servidor público de GNUsocial.

Los servidores de GNUsocial están interconectados para crear una enorme red social centrada en la privacidad y controlada por sus miembros. También se puede conectar con muchas redes sociales tradicionales. Mira en https://the-federation.info/platform/20 para poder ver un listado de servidores alternativos de GNUsocial donde puedes darte de alta.

Una vez registrado, por favor contacta conmigo a través de mi página de perfil en:

https://gnusocial.nsupdate.info/lu4ehf

Para más información sobre el proyecto GNUsocial y por qué sentimos que es importante, visite https://gnusocial.network/ , por favor

#mastodon #diaspora #twitter #social #facebook #friendica #spanish #es #español #fediverso #fediverse #hola #nuevo #hi #new #presentación #gnusocial

So I've been talking about something called #OpenSimulator. But what is it, this OpenSimulator thing?

Let me start this way: Currently, lots of entrepreneurs, startups and trillion-dollar megacorporations are jumping onto the #Metaverse bandwagon. OpenSimulator has been driving that same bandwagon for over a decade already without almost anyone noticing.

Technically speaking, OpenSimulator (or #OpenSim in short) is a free, #OpenSource server application for virtual 3-D worlds that runs on Windows and Linux.

But it's somewhat like Linux: Technically speaking, Linux is a kernel. But everyone says that Linux is an operating system.

So in practice, "OpenSimulator" refers to a number of online worlds called "grids". Yes, a number. Not just one. No matter how many #VirtualWorlds you've heard of, you may not have heard of OpenSim yet. That's because it isn't made by a company with an advertising budget but pretty much entirely by its user community.

Metaverse before Meta, decentralised before Decentraland

Decentraland advertises itself as, quote, "the first fully decentralized world", end quote. This is far from true, but the #Decentraland makers probably don't know that themselves because they may never have heard of OpenSim.

In fact, OpenSim has been around for much longer than Decentraland, namely since 2007. And it has always been as fully decentralised as a virtual world could possibly be. OpenSim has several thousand (!) independent grids, every single one of them being run by someone else, some by companies, a few by foundations, most by private persons. To give you an impression, Hypergrid Business has a grid list that's nowhere near exhaustive, nor is it always up-to-date, what with grids shutting down and new grids being launched all the time.

The OpenSim core developers are someone else than the many grid owners again. The various client applications, a.k.a. viewers, are developed by someone else yet again. There isn't any one big entity, much less a profit-oriented company, that's in control of the entire OpenSimulator ecosystem.

But those grids aren't several thousand walled-garden worlds separated and isolated from one another. Almost all of them are interconnected in the so-called #Hypergrid. This means that you can have an avatar on one grid and visit an entirely different grid with that avatar. You can (usually) take your entire inventory with you, and you can (usually) even pick up things on other grids and take them back home with you.

OpenSimulator is as decentralised and federated as #Mastodon, as #Diaspora, as #XMPP, as #Matrix, as #email. And it has been for almost one and a half decades now. Decades; that's an eternity in the online world. The Hypergrid is the closest to a "metaverse" of separate but inter-connected virtual worlds that we've come to date.

And there are actually several grids and institutions in OpenSim that have been carrying the word "Metaverse" in their names since long before Facebook became Meta. There's the Infinite Metaverse Alliance with its Metaverse Depot grid. Alternate Metaverse is one of the biggest grids on the Hypergrid. Just to name a few.

So at no point has OpenSim jumped upon the Metaverse bandwagon.

Second Life, but free and open-source and distributed

If you came here from Mastodon or elsewhere on the Fediverse, let me describe OpenSim to you this way: OpenSim is to #SecondLife what #Mastodon is to #Twitter. The main difference is that OpenSim has still got 99% of Second Life's look-and-feel plus most of its functionality. That's because it literally is a Second Life clone.

Remember Second Life? Guess what: It's still around. It has been since 2003. Yes, that long. 2006/2007 was only the huge hype. Even if it has been around for that long, it doesn't look anything like back then anymore. People who come back to Second Life after they've been there during the hype for the last time are blown away by just seeing mesh avatars.

What made OpenSim possible was when Second Life made its official viewer open-source. Anyone could see Second Life's API. For one, this was used to create third-party viewers. But beyond that, Second Life's inner workings could be extrapolated from the API. This knowledge was used to develop a wholly new system for virtual worlds, essentially Second Life with no big corporation behind it, no meddling Lindens all over the place, none of Second Life's rampant commercialism, but otherwise the same. This system was named OpenSimulator and first released in 2007.

Shortly afterwards, an experimental grid named #OSgrid was created as a testbed for the development of OpenSim. About 15 years later, OSgrid is by far the oldest and biggest grid on the Hypergrid, the latter both in land area and number of avatars, while still being a testbed.

It was fairly easy for OpenSim to take off because it has been using largely the same viewers as Second Life ever since. This, however, also means that the development of OpenSim is closely linked to that of Second Life.

Bigger than you may think

Now you may believe that OpenSim is tiny because "nobody knows it". It isn't. Let's have a look at the April 2022 statistics on Hypergrid Business to estimate just how big OpenSim is. Estimate because even Hypergrid Business only knows the stats from fewer than 300 grids; thousands of mostly small grids don't report any stats. For comparison, here are March 2022 stats for Second Life.

For one, those under 300 grids reported a good 43,000 unique active users. That's nothing in comparison to Facebook or pre-Elon Musk Twitter. But Second Life hasn't gone over 55,000 active users this year either.

Okay, so OpenSim has fewer users than Second Life. But it has got a greater landmass.

A standard region in both Second Life and OpenSim is a square that measures 256x256m (that's 65,536m² or 78,380 square yards for you Americans or nine football fields for you Germans). Second Life reported some 27,400 of these standard regions in use. Meanwhile, those under 300 OpenSim grids reported about 100,000 regions. This is not a typo. One hundred thousand. That's more than two regions per user. OSgrid alone reported 36,500 regions, making this grid alone bigger than Second Life by one third. Now you know why it's much less likely to meet other avatars on the Hypergrid than it is in Second Life.

How can OpenSim have such a huge landmass? Well, that's because land is way cheaper on the Hypergrid than in Second Life. There are two reasons for this.

One is that OpenSim is largely uncommercial. Entire regions usually do cost money, but much much less than in Second Life. You only have to pay to support the operation of the grid which often is in the hands of private people. You usually do not have to pay employees, and you never have to pay investors or shareholders. There are commercial grids, but they're the exception, and yet, they don't tax sales like Second Life and #HorizonWorlds do. Most grids don't have any means of in-world payment whatsoever.

The other one is that OpenSim has got much much more space in general. Not long ago, Second Life actually almost ran out of space. Its grid can't grow much bigger. Land is scarce, therefore it's expensive. OpenSim, in contrast, will never run out of space. A grid can consist of several hundred million regions. The maximum landmass is limited by available CPU power rather than area. Even that can be increased by running one grid on several servers; OpenSim scales very well.

Your own Second Life

This is also the reason why there are so many grids: Anyone can run their own grid and attach it to the Hypergrid if they want to. OpenSim can be hosted on anything from rented professional Web space to a Windows laptop to a Raspberry Pi (although you probably shouldn't host parties with well-known DJs on a self-hosted, Raspi-based grid).

So not only are there probably more users with at least one region of their own than without one, but at least every tenth user may be a grid admin, considering that bigger public grids often have more than one admin.

OpenSim has taken decentralisation to its full extent, much like e-mail or XMPP or Matrix or Mastodon. If you don't like the grid you're on, you can move to someone else's grid, or you can start your own grid and be "your own Linden", so-to-speak.

There's a vision of commercial, corporate-owned virtual worlds joining into a Metaverse. This will never happen because these worlds will never be sufficiently compatible to one another. OpenSim's Hypergrid, in contrast, is a network of connected virtual worlds that's reality already now.

All without having to throw yourself at any one profit-greedy company. No crypto-currencies, no NFTs, no blockchain. OpenSimulator is the Metaverse for the people, run by the same people.

Ja, im #Fediverse sind jetzt in etwa zehn Millionen Accounts registriert, das ist schon toll, allerdings sollte man nicht davon ausgehen, dass diese zehn Millionen Accounts auch alle aktiv sind. Wesentlich sinnvoller als die Gesamtzahl sollte man lieber auf die im letzten Monat oder meinetwegen auch auf die im letzten halben Jahr aktiven Accounts schauen, und da sieht es doch etwas anders aus. Im letzten Monat aktiv waren nur etwa ein viertel der zehn Millionen Accounts und im letzten Halben Jahr aktiv etwas mehr als die Hälfte, also knapp sechs Millionen. Bei aller Begeisterung über die zehn Millionen sollte man also auch so ehrlich sein und dazu sagen, dass sehr viele dieser Accounts nicht genutzt werden.

Und davon mal abgesehen ist ein anstieg von etwa 450.000 monatlich aktiven Accounts im März '22 auf etwa 2,4 Millionen aktiver Accounts im März '23 doch auch ein ziemlicher Zuwachs an Nutzern der von den meist als Hobby Projekt betriebenen Instanzen ja auch erstmal bewältigt werden muss und bis jetzt auch bewältigt wurde. Und das ist doch auch toll.

Interessant ist übrigens auch, dass das nach gesamt Nutzerzahl zweitgrößte Projekt im Fediverse nach #Mastodon immer noch #Diaspora ist.

• https://the-federation.info/#projects

#Friendica #Pleroma #Pixelfed #Misskey #NeuHier

Allow me to digress from the usual topic on this channel once more.

I'm pretty sure that no human being on this planet has created nearly as many federated social platforms as @mike. But all these (actually not always so) different platforms can be a bit confusing. Even I may be wrong here and there, but I'll try to make some sense of them by putting them into a kind of chronology.


So first, there was #Friendica. Only that it started out under the name of #Mistpark. I'll get to the name later.

Remember #Diaspora? Remember summer 2010 when the crowdfunding run was launched so that those four guys could spend all their time creating a free, #OpenSource, decentralised, federated social network (a.k.a. #Facebook killer) which they wanted to name Diaspora*?

Well, they unknowingly wanted to re-invent the wheel. #StatusNet was already there, #GNUsocial was already there, and especially, Mistpark was already there with a 1.x release and more powerful than both, actually, more powerful than Diaspora would ever become. I think Mistpark even already had Diaspora*'s aspects, only that they were called groups.

As for its concept, Mistpark went beyond that of Diaspora*. Mistpark didn't only want a bunch of instances ("nodes" in this case) of its own kind to connect with one another, it also wanted to federate with everything else that moved, be it e-mail, be it StatusNet, be it Twitter, be it whatever.

The first name change was from Mistpark to #Friendika. The reason was that the original name sounded repelling to German speakers. "Mist" means "fog" in English, but "dung" or "manure" in German, not to mention that it's a German curse word.

When Diaspora* was finally there, Friendika didn't see it as competition, it saw it as another federation target. To this day, Friendica is fully federated with Diaspora*, and that has exclusively been the work of the Friendika developers who studied Diaspora*'s source code and reverse-engineer it because it didn't have an API.

Probably the biggest coup was the bidirectional federation with Facebook. This was what everyone was waiting for. This, however, was also where the trouble started. Facebook didn't want to be federated with a non-commercial social network and started taking defensive measures. Also, Friendica users (the second name change was through meanwhile) who used the Facebook connector had their entire and often very busy Facebook timelines mirrored onto Friendica nodes, one of the reasons why even nodes on powerful root servers often had to close new registrations even though they only had a little over a hundred users. So there were several reasons why Facebook federation was axed again.

Internally, Friendica uses its own protocol named #DFRN. But I guess Mike had meanwhile seen it as a dead end, also because he had a new idea: #NomadicIdentity, not only the ability to easily take your account from one instance to another, but the possibility to have it on multiple instances at the same time, keeping the copies in sync.

That's why he laid the foundation for a new protocol that could do that: #Zot.


And with it came the next social platform. It was first just simply named Red from Spanish "red" = "net". Red was based on Zot from the beginning, and as an experimental platform, it only understood Zot. On Friendica which was now running at full steam on dozens upon dozens of nodes, and which Mike had passed on to the community, the development was followed with interest. And just like later platforms, I think Red actually got a few small public instances because someone really wanted to try it out. Red eventually changed its name to #RedMatrix.

Also, Red didn't just want to be a social network like Friendica. The idea was rather to have a "social content management system" that could do just about everything you could do with a website and/or a cloud server. Third-party federation was slightly reduced, connections to commercial platforms didn't come back. But as Red evolved, the Diaspora* connector was included which was also used to federate Red with Friendica.


From the Red Matrix emerged #Hubzilla, the Swiss Army knife of the #Fediverse. Still today, its possibilities have rarely ever been fleshed out: not only microblogging, but macroblogging, article publication, websites, wikis (no, I'm not kidding), #WebDAV, #CalDAV and #CardDAV server and so forth.

Next to the nomadic identity that came with Zot, Hubzilla introduced another killer feature: one account, many separate channels. Each one of these channels is basically like one Friendica account. You can have multiple fully separate identities on one account, and nobody (except the instance admin) can tell that they're all you. So this goes way beyond Friendica's multiple profiles. By the way, Hubzilla still has multiple profiles per channel.

Some say that the Red Matrix was renamed Hubzilla. This isn't true. Hubzilla is a fork of the Red Matrix, one could say it was a stable snapshot of the Red Matrix.

For the development of the Red Matrix continued. Planned advancements on Zot couldn't be tested on stable Hubzilla, they needed their own testbed. Eventually, the last Red Matrix instance was Mike's personal one with himself as the only user. It still federated with Friendica and, of course, Hubzilla.

In the meantime, #ActivityPub came along. It wasn't just another obscure networking protocol, though, because #Mastodon made it huge. So at least Friendica and Hubzilla had to adopt it. Friendica firmly integrated it. Hubzilla made it into an app just like all other protocols that aren't Zot because they stand in the way of fully nomadic identity. By the way, both profited from its introduction because the federation between each other no longer had to use the Diaspora* protocol.


For the next advancements of Zot, two new platforms were forked from the Red Matrix or Hubzilla. At this point, Mike wasn't involved with Hubzilla anymore either. First, there was #Osada, an early testbed for what would become #Zot6, but still with ActivityPub. For pure Zot6, #Zap followed suit. Most connectors that are neither Zot nor ActivityPub, including the one to Diaspora*, weren't taken over, as were many of Hubzilla's extra abilities (websites, articles, wiki, CardDAV, two parallel calendar systems etc.) to keep it slim. It did get to keep the various types of channels as well as one CalDAV server and the WebDAV connection, though.

Eventually, when Mike handed them over to the community, they used the exact same code base. The only differences between Osada and Zap was whether or not the admin had ActivityPub on (Osada) or off (Zap) and the name.

As having two different names for the same thing, depending on the instance configuration, Osada was discontinued in favour of Zap which now included ActivityPub itself. In the meantime, Zot6 became stable and was backported into Hubzilla which thereby became fully compatible to Zap, only that what Hubzilla can that Zap can't cannot be mirrored to Zap.

Then Osada re-emerged as Zap's unstable branch. Along with it came a new Red Matrix which, as far as I could see, was now an even more purist, even more unstable branch that only served for testing Zot8 and lacked all other protocols.

To top this off, in 2020, Zap itself got a stable branch even more intended for productive use. For this purpose, the name Mistpark was dusted off. The new stable branch was named #Mistpark2020 or simply #Misty. Misty was the first of its kind to not even get an announcement anymore, though. Its home page on Zotlabs disappeared along with Zotlabs before it could be filled with any useful information.

Two things were interesting: Red Matrix, Osada, Zap and Misty were based on various states of the same code base. It was possible to switch from one to another by rebasing the local code repository on your server. This became obvious through instances that carry the name of one project but run another one.


It must have been in 2021 when #Roadhouse showed up, again, unannounced. It seemed to be nothing more than a concept for the next generation of distributed social platforms. Roadhouse was the first of its kind to use the #Nomad protocol which, I guess, is forked from #Zot because it serves the same purpose. It got its own home page on Zotlabs which remained as uninformational as Misty's.


And then the most recent name popped up: #Streams. At first, it was even less clear what Streams was supposed to be and what set it apart from Roadhouse, not to mention Red Matrix, Osada, Zap and Misty, also because Zotlabs didn't say what Streams was either.

But I guess Streams' purpose has emerged in the meantime through word-of-mouth: It's the experimental successor of all five and the solution to this maze of names. Streams isn't even a product with a name, it's a concept that uses Nomad for nomadic identity and that is in constant flux, hence Streams. The idea was to do away with fixed names to get rid of the previous chaos. Everyone can name whatever they do with Streams however they want.

There is currently only one more or less public Streams instance, but it still carries "Stream" in its name. At least two more instances which may be private are named something with "Streams", too. So whether Mike wants or not, Streams has become a name of its own, and people use it.

How many Streams instances exactly exist right now is hard to tell, even from Communities pages on Streams instances or Sites pages on older platforms, because they don't necessarily identify themselves as Streams instances. So if you go through one of these pages, and there are names in the Projects column which you don't know as Fediverse platforms, check out what's behind them. It's often only one instance. Open the instance, click its burger menu, and if there's a Communities link, it's a Streams instance. I've discovered a lot of Streams instances not named anything with Streams this way. Private instances included, I guess Streams must have more than a dozen instances already.

There has even already been a request to launch a Streams support forum much like the one for Hubzilla; after all, Streams still supports forums. It's safe to say that Streams is doing quite well for something so obscure.

Feature-wise, Streams is the same as Zap and Misty.


But what became of the six platforms between Hubzilla and Streams?

• Red Matrix kept having only this one single-user instance because nobody else dared to touch it and set up another instance. It's a Zap instance now as far as I can see.
  
• Osada never really took off, Zap probably did only after Osada was merged into it, and some Osada instances became Zap instances. This explains why Zap has got comparably many instances. Most of them, however, are tiny, probably private and utterly undermaintained as they run rather old Zap versions. Zap only lives by numbers, and it's the only one of the five listed on Fediverse Observer. Also, while the FediDB lists all five, it only knows that one Dominican public Zap instance and none of the others (looking through its connected sites reveals many unlisted instances of Zot-based networks, by the way). Still, it seems to be on the deathbed, being superseded by Streams, experimental as the latter may be.
  There still seem to be a very few running Osada instances, but Osada can be considered dead as the focus is on Streams now.
  
• Misty didn't take off either, even though it was considered more stable and more production-grade than Zap. This time, the reason may simply be because Misty got zero advertising, so nobody heard about it, probably not even some of the Zap crowd. Misty never had many instances, they weren't properly advertised either (the same applies to most Zap instances, by the way), and Misty's death knell may have been the unannounced shutdown of its largest instance. Basically, there was little room for Misty next to less obscure Zap.
  
• Roadhouse didn't even manage to get much limelight before Streams appeared shortly afterwards. In both cases, the only way to find out what they were and what they did was by either studying the source code or installing a private instance. Streams, however, had the advantage of being even newer. The-Federation.info knows exactly one German Roadhouse instance which was originally set up as Misty and has meanwhile been upgraded beyond Roadhouse to Streams, and there only seems to be one remaining unlisted Roadhouse instance.
  
• I've seen another result of an upgrade from Zap to Misty. So it's safe to assume that you can upgrade all five to Streams. If this is the case, then now that Streams is here, it probably isn't worth spreading the developer community across six almost identical platforms. Basically, Streams has become the latest version of Red Matrix, Osada, Zap, Misty and Roadhouse.
  
• At least Red Matrix, Osada, Zap and Misty are still being maintained in a sense, though. All four got the same small Git commit from Mike a good month ago. Roadhouse got one four months ago.

As of now, Friendica is still going strong, so is Hubzilla, and Streams seems to be cleaning up the mess that came after Hubzilla.

If you really want to try out something with Zot, my current recommendation is Hubzilla, even if it may seem bloated and cumbersome to you, even if you'll never harness its full power. Many of its extra functions are additional apps and switched off by default; this includes ActivityPub, by the way, this is important to know.

It's hard to find a public Streams instance with open registrations currently, much less multiple ones that'd be required for a nomadic identity. Neither Fediverse.party nor the FediDB nor The-Federation.info nor Fediverse.info even knows Streams, and existing Streams instances usually don't identify to other Fediverse servers as Streams instances. It's still a rather underground and grass-roots project with no publicity at all. As Streams is rather experimental, however, you may want a nomadic home on at least two instances to have an instant backup, should one of them shut down.

Zap has got exactly one instance open to the public, and seeing as Zap may be shrinking rather than growing, I don't expect this to change. Again, due to Zap's still small size and unclear future, I wouldn't recommend using it without nomadic identity as a safety net.

As for Osada or Misty, good luck finding an instance to join, much less one that's here to stay and ideally be upgraded to Streams one day.

Hubzilla may not be as bleeding-edge as Streams, and it may be overkill for your purposes if Zap or Streams would be sufficient, but it's stable, it's big enough, it's established, and it's different enough from Streams to not be endangered by it. I mean, Hubzilla hasn't managed to kill off Friendica either, right?

Hallo #neuhier, aber auch #althier. Weil ich erst neulich gefragt wurde, warum ich #Friendica #Mastodon bevorzuge, wollte ich hier einmal kurz schreiben, wieso ich Friendica nutze. Erst einmal vorweg: Ich finde Mastodon nicht schlecht, ist echt eine sehr gute Möglichkeit die #Fediverse zu nutzen.

Aber mir persönlich gefällt die Usability bzw. die Oberfläche von Mastodon nicht. Ich stehe mehr auf die Threadansicht von Beiträgen. Bei Mastodon fehlt mir diese. Da werden mir in der Timeline Antworten von Beiträgen reingespült, bei denen mir der komplette Zusammenhang fehlt. Das ist der Hauptgrund.

Ein weiterer Grund sind tatsächlich die Features von Friendica. Genial finde ich die Möglichkeit, Beiträge ohne einer Zeichenbegrenzung zu erstellen. Ein Hammerfeature sind die Foren bei Friendica. Man kann diese sehr einfach erstellen und das restliche Fediverse kann solche Foren mitnutzen. Mit Ausnahme von #Diaspora, da klappt das mit den Foren meines Wissens nicht.

Dann kann man seine Kontakte in Gruppen sortieren und sich einen Stream nur mit den Kontakten aus den jeweiligen Gruppen anzeigen lassen.

Auch das Abonnieren von #Hastags funktioniert recht einfach. Solch abonnierte Hashtags werden mir dann auch in meinem Netzwerkstream angezeigt, auch wenn diese von User stammen, die nicht in meiner Kontaktliste sind. Bei meinem Testkonto habe ich zum Beispiel nicht einen Kontakt, aber dank der Hashtags wird der Netzwerkstream trotzdem mit interessanten Beiträgen gefüllt.

Ach ich könnte noch das eine oder andere Feature von Friendica aufführen. Aber seht doch selber die komplette Featureliste an:
Features – friendica

Ein weiterer für mich wichtiger Grund ist die wirklich gute #Community rund um Friendica. Auch der Kontakt mit den Entwicklern ist wirklich sehr vorbildlich. Es gibt auch ein aktiv genutztes Supportforum, bei dem einem bei Fragen oder Problemen immer mit Rat und Tat zur Seite gestanden wird.

Sollte jetzt jemand neugierig auf Friendica geworden sein, der kann sich gerne auf https://anonsys.net ein Konto klicken oder sich eine Instanz aus der Liste der öffentlichen Server aussuchen: https://dir.friendica.social/servers

Estás cordialmente invitado a unirte a mi y a otros amigos en Friendica, creemos juntos una red social mejor.

Para aceptar la invitación visita y regístrate en https://friendicarg.nsupdate.info o en cualquier otro servidor público de Friendica.

Los servidores de Friendica están interconectados para crear una enorme red social centrada en la privacidad y controlada por sus miembros. También se puede conectar con muchas redes sociales tradicionales. Mira en https://dir.friendica.social/servers para poder ver un listado de servidores alternativos de Friendica donde puedes darte de alta.

Una vez registrado, por favor contacta conmigo a través de mi página de perfil en:

https://friendicarg.nsupdate.info/profile/fabianbonetti

Para más información sobre el proyecto Friendica y por qué sentimos que es importante, visite http://friendi.ca, por favor

#mastodon #diaspora #twitter #social #facebook #friendica #spanish #es #español #fediverso #fediverse #hola #nuevo #hi #new #presentación